The AI ‘Jobs Apocalypse’ That Isn’t

SUMMARY

• So far, AI is boosting productivity and profits, not destroying jobs.
• Unit labor costs are moderating, supporting both earnings and lower inflation.
• Research finds no significant AI-driven harm to employment or wages yet.

Talk of the 'AI jobs apocalypse' has reached a fever pitch. Some luminaries are predicting that AI is permanently impairing the jobs landscape — and judging by the jeers experienced by university commencement speakers brave enough to mention artificial intelligence, young workers are terrified.

While that may end up proving true — RiverFront's value of 'humility' is never more relevant than when trying to predict the future — AI adoption has boosted economic output far more than it's disrupted the jobs market thus far. The April employment report beat expectations, and US employment has increased by a net 304,000 jobs so far this year…well above last year's 169,000 through April. Meanwhile, job openings held steady, and both layoffs and quits were little changed per the most recent JOLTS data.

Importantly for corporate profits and the stock market, output per hour worked — a proxy for productivity — is skyrocketing. In Q1, non-farm business productivity rose 2.9% year-over-year, well above its long-term trend. Productivity has grown above trend since the release of ChatGPT in fall 2022 (see Chart 1, below), a dynamic we’ve been writing about for some time, with regard to our concept of ‘US Economic Exceptionalism’.

Meanwhile, ‘unit labor costs,’ or an approximation for the hourly compensation required to produce the US’ economic output, is growing less than 2% over the past year. Moderating unit labor costs mean lower pricing power for workers, but the flip side is a tailwind for corporate profits, since wages are one of Corporate America's largest input costs. This may be one key factor behind Q1's all-time high corporate profits and cash flow across both public and private companies (see Chart 3, below) — a trend visible in S&P 500 earnings as well, as we discussed in last week’s commentary.

Moderating unit labor costs are also historically linked to lower core inflation, as measured by core PCE (dark blue line, Chart 2 right). This is particularly important for an economy — and a Federal Reserve — trying to manage through a large headline inflation spike caused by the ongoing war in Iran.

This is not to say AI isn't impacting jobs, particularly in tech — but thus far it looks more like a transition than a collapse, in our opinion. Challenger, Gray & Christmas counted nearly 50,000 AI-linked job cuts announced by US companies so far in 2026, roughly 17% of all announced layoffs. However, in our view, tech managers are likely using AI as a convenient excuse for needed headcount reductions after the sector's massive COVID-era hiring binge. Supporting this view, non-farm payrolls in the Information industry, while declining, appear to be simply normalizing back to pre-COVID levels.

Recent academic research supports this thesis. The Yale Budget Lab's monthly econometric analysis comparing AI-exposed and AI-unexposed occupations found no statistically or economically significant impact on either employment or real hourly wages for AI-exposed workers. Similar findings from the Brookings Institution and the New York Fed point to the same conclusion: so far, AI appears to be stabilizing and possibly cooling America's labor market — not destroying it.

CONCLUSION: So Far, So Good…AI Boosting, Not Breaking the Economy

Despite widespread fears of AI 'hollowing out' the labor market, the US economy is experiencing something like the best of both worlds: rising productivity alongside a resilient jobs market. AI adoption is clearly reshaping the economy — from labor to capital — but the net effect on GDP thus far appears positive, not negative. This echoes the pattern of prior industrial revolutions, in which technological innovation ultimately created economic prosperity and opportunity, albeit unevenly — a dynamic we explored more extensively in our November 2025 deep dive into AI's macro and microeconomic effects also reinforces our continued belief in 'US Economic Exceptionalism' and our related conviction to remain invested in US assets.

Risk Discussion: All investments in securities, including the strategies discussed above, include a risk of loss of principal (invested amount) and any profits that have not been realized. Markets fluctuate substantially over time, and have experienced increased volatility in recent years due to global and domestic economic events. Performance of any investment is not guaranteed. In a rising interest rate environment, the value of fixed-income securities generally declines. Diversification does not guarantee a profit or protect against a loss. Investments in international and emerging markets securities include exposure to risks such as currency fluctuations, foreign taxes and regulations, and the potential for illiquid markets and political instability. Please see the end of this publication for more disclosures.