Your choice regarding cookies: We use cookies when you use this Website. These may be 'session' cookies, meaning they delete themselves when you leave the Website, or 'persistent' cookies which do not delete themselves and help us recognize you when you return so we can provide a tailored service. However, you can block our usage by adjusting your browser settings to refuse cookies.
SUMMARY
- Despite trade uncertainty, we do not foresee a recession on the horizon.
- The US economy continues to show resiliency, which we believe matters for the stock market.
- Stock volatility in the absence of a recession generally ends more quickly, and inflicts less damage than recessionary bear markets.
This past week, news flow around policy came in hot and heavy, with President Trump’s ‘Big, Beautiful’ tax cut bill passing the House of Representatives, and Trump threatening 50% tariffs on the European Union (EU). While progress on tax relief was welcome if not sufficient to reignite a stock rally – the bill in some form must still find passage in the Senate – risk markets chose to focus instead on trade tensions, ending the week on a sour note. This back-and-forth on trade is to be expected (note that Trump softened his tone on Europe over the weekend), and fits with the Trump Administration’s negotiation style. Trade talks with the EU – a conglomeration of 27 countries with differing sizes, export strengths and incentives – were always likely to be fractious, and we are not holding our breath for resolution before the 90-day ‘trade pause’ expires.

Despite these headlines, however, we are unlikely to meaningfully shift the probabilities assigned to our four economic outcomes – discussed here - as a result of last week’s news flow. We still believe the likeliest outcome is a ‘Muddle Through’ scenario, whereby headlines stay chaotic in the near-term, but the US is able to reach trade deals with most major trade partners by the 2nd half of the year, and the economy is able to avoid recession in ’25. Underneath this ‘Headline Hell’, the US economy continues to show considerable signs of resilience, in our view. Earnings season has been better than expected thus far, inflation indicators continue to moderate, and – importantly - very few of the indicators we track on our ‘Recession Dashboard’ are flashing red in the US. For instance, the Atlanta Fed’s GDPNow activity tracker (Chart 1, above) is currently suggesting the US economy is growing at about a 2.4% annual growth rate after its’ brief technical downturn in Q1 (the downturn was related in our opinion to extraordinary pre-tariff trade flows, as discussed here). While ‘soft’ (survey-based) data appears weaker than ‘hard’ (evidence-based) data, PMI surveys remain slightly above the 50 level typically associated with economic expansions and employment data continues to be robust, in our view.
Economic Resiliency Matters for the Stock Market
It is unclear whether 2025’s extreme volatility will usher in a cyclical ‘bear’ market in the US, narrowly defined as at least a -20% correction off recent highs. The S&P 500, which recorded a peak-to-trough decline of about -19% from mid-February to early April before rallying strongly, has thus far barely avoided being labeled as such. But this near miss brings into focus the importance of US economic health to stock market returns in volatile conditions.
An NDR Research historical study spanning 125 years using the Dow Jones Industrial Index suggests that cyclical bear markets that are not subsequently followed by a recession (defined as two straight quarters of contraction in US GDP) are much shallower and shorter than ‘recessionary bears.’ To this point, non-recessionary bear markets are down an average of -25% over an average span of 212 days, while bear market downturns associated with recession average a -35% drop and last 353 days on average. Regardless of a bear market label, similar research studies by NDR on the S&P 500 suggest stocks tend to decrease sharply at the onset of a recession (see Chart 2, below). To us, this underlines the importance of trying to identify impending recessions if possible…as ‘forewarned is forearmed’

These linkages between recessions and stock market returns pass the ‘common sense’ test, in our opinion. This is because economic downturns tend to damage the trend of corporate earnings, which we believe are a primary driver of stock prices over an intermediate (12-24 month +) period. Parsing the last twelve US recessions going back to 1947, S&P 500 earnings have fallen in nine out of the twelve, by a mean of over -16% (source: NDR Research, RiverFont). While ‘stagflationary’ recessions such as 1973 or 1980 tend to have relatively mild to nonexistent earnings downturns (as inflation can actually boost revenue in nominal terms), deep deflationary recessions, such as 2008, tend to witness much more dramatic earnings declines.
CONCLUSION
The bottom line is that the instance and type of recession matters a lot for stocks, through the transmission mechanism of corporate earnings. This is what makes our call for no recession and continued earnings resilience a key pillar of our generally constructive stance on US stocks… despite recent headline-related volatility.
Risk Discussion: All investments in securities, including the strategies discussed above, include a risk of loss of principal (invested amount) and any profits that have not been realized. Markets fluctuate substantially over time, and have experienced increased volatility in recent years due to global and domestic economic events. Performance of any investment is not guaranteed. In a rising interest rate environment, the value of fixed-income securities generally declines. Diversification does not guarantee a profit or protect against a loss. Investments in international and emerging markets securities include exposure to risks such as currency fluctuations, foreign taxes and regulations, and the potential for illiquid markets and political instability. Please see the end of this publication for more disclosures.