Walking the Talk

Putting our Outlook 2024 and refreshed CMAs to Use in Portfolios

SUMMARY

Over the next five to seven years, we believe…

  • Bonds will have an increased role in balanced portfolios.
  • Today’s high cash rates will not last.
  • Muted stock returns will require more active management.
  • Headwinds for international outperformance will remain.

RiverFront recently published its refreshed capital market assumptions (CMAs) for 2024 (see summary here, from January 9th). We view long-term (5-7 year forward) capital forecasts as a useful part of the allocation process, helping to identify and monitor the important long-range valuation drivers for markets.

Shown for illustrative purposes. The table above depicts RiverFront’s predictions for 2024 using three scenarios (Pessimistic (Bear), Base, and Optimistic (Bull)). The assessment is based on RiverFront’s Investment Team’s views and opinions as of December 18, 2023. Each case is hypothetical and is not based on actual investor experience. The returns above are not an indication of RiverFront portfolio or product performance.

From these updated CMAs we believe that long-term asset allocators should consider the following:

  1. Increasing bond allocations and adjusting the tenor of that exposure: The TINA market, which stood for There Is No Alternative, existed when bond yields were nearly non-existent, and investors had little choice beyond equities to garner positive returns. However, with the recent rise in yields, investors now have more attractive longer-term investment options in the fixed income arena. In our ‘base case’ scenario we expect bonds, as represented by the Bloomberg Aggregate Index, to return 5.6% annually over the next 5-to-7 years, which is competitive with our 7% return expectations for US large-cap stocks. We have generally increased our duration (sensitivity to interest rates) in the fixed income side of our balanced portfolios as yields have risen.

    These more attractive opportunities for long-term investors must be balanced, in our view, with our more cautious near-term opinion on the path of interest rates, which may need to move higher as the market recalibrates its’ view of Fed action in the face of a resilient economy. We will opportunistically look to add to specific maturities along the curve, preferring shorter-maturity bonds given the inverted yield curve. We prefer taking credit risk (corporate bonds) over interest rate risk (Treasury bonds) right now, as we think the economy will continue to grow and keep default rates low.
  2. Becoming ‘pickier’ in equities, especially international: Our long-term equity CMAs of 7% for large-cap US (US), 8.3% for developed international (DI) and 6.3% for emerging markets (EM) may seem low. However, we believe that there are opportunities to amplify these returns through effective security selection. Below are a few of our favorite selection themes within US and International equities:
    • US - P.A.T.T.Y.: In our view, the current valuation and interest rate environment is less conducive to all stocks, but ripe with opportunities for security selection. We expect those companies that can generate consistent and growing dividends and cashflow yields will garner premium valuations over their peers. This investment strategy is best epitomized by the acronym P.A.T.T.Y. – ‘Pay Attention To The Yield’. We see attractive P.A.T.T.Y. opportunities in industries like technology, energy, mining, financials, and healthcare.
Source: LSEG Datastream, RiverFront; data monthly, as of 1.1.2024. Chart shown for illustrative purposes only. Past performance is no indication of future results.
  • Developed International - Headwinds for outperformance remain. DI remains attractively valued relative to the US using traditional metrics but may remain so for several reasons. We struggle with International and especially European companies’ inability to consistently drive earnings growth. As can be seen in Chart 1 above, MSCI Europe earnings have grown significantly less than the S&P 500 since the financial crisis in 2008. This makes a huge difference when we think about intrinsic value. While Europe appears “cheap” by traditional valuation metrics, the ‘intrinsic value’ (adjusting valuation for future earnings growth) is not as attractive as it seems. Eventually, Europe may be able to translate the positive macro-economic backdrop into consistent earnings growth like its US peers, but we are not fully convinced that that will happen anytime soon. Additionally, we believe structural growth remains lower and inflation issues stickier in most international economies relative to the US. Therefore, we continue to be selective abroad and favor higher quality companies in the region. We like value-oriented industries, like financials and energy, and companies that have durable competitive advantages that allow them to pass inflation on to their customers.
  • Steering away from China in Emerging Markets: EM may struggle given that mainland China and its’ Hong-Kong-listed companies continue to dominate the emerging market index, representing more than 26% of its make-up as of December 31, 2023. In our view, the relative attractiveness of investing in China has declined significantly in recent years due to rising government intervention, declining transparency, poor demographics, and the unpredictability of foreign shareholder rights. These structural issues are being compounded by conflicts over trade, a slowing Chinese economy and growing political tensions with the US. For these reasons, we believe a more active approach to emerging market investing is appropriate. We anticipate much of China’s economic losses will represent opportunities for other emerging market economies. For example, sophisticated technology producers with closer allegiances to the US, such as Korea and Taiwan, will likely benefit from the intellectual property ‘Cold War’ between the US and China. In addition, smaller manufacturing hubs such as Malaysia and Vietnam will likely see increased demand from the US and Western allies relocating supply chains away from China.

3. Putting Excess Cash to Work: In our view, the Federal Reserve put holders of cash and cash equivalents on alert in December 2023 when not a single Fed official projected short-term rates rising above their current levels of 5.25-5.5%. In fact, the Fed forecasted a year-end Fed Funds target of 4.5-4.75% in the ‘dot plot’ that was released at their December 13th meeting. This would represent three 25 basis point cuts in 2024. Investors believe that the Fed will be even more aggressive than that in 2024 and are expecting between five and six cuts, with the first cut occurring at their May 1st meeting, according to the Fed Fund futures market. While the timing and degree of rate cuts is still uncertain, we do believe that 5+% short-term rates now have an expiration date, and that date is sometime in 2024.

With rate cuts on the horizon, putting excess cash to work in either stocks or bonds becomes increasingly important. A recent NDR Research report suggests to us that investors may want to make portfolio adjustments prior to any action by the Fed since ten-year bonds historically appreciate 75 to 100 basis points three months prior to the initial cut in interest rates.

Risk Discussion: All investments in securities, including the strategies discussed above, include a risk of loss of principal (invested amount) and any profits that have not been realized. Markets fluctuate substantially over time, and have experienced increased volatility in recent years due to global and domestic economic events. Performance of any investment is not guaranteed. In a rising interest rate environment, the value of fixed-income securities generally declines. Diversification does not guarantee a profit or protect against a loss. Investments in international and emerging markets securities include exposure to risks such as currency fluctuations, foreign taxes and regulations, and the potential for illiquid markets and political instability. Please see the end of this publication for more disclosures.